3 ms·
I was responding to your off-hand comment "You know what else is expensive? Entire cities being under 6ft of ocean and having to relocate hundreds of millions o
by NortySpock 6y ago
I was responding to your off-hand comment "You know what else is expensive? Entire cities being under 6ft of ocean and having to relocate hundreds of millions of people."
6ft of water seems somewhat manageable, relatively speaking, so long as you're willing to move up a story or go full neo-Venice.
- orthecreedence 6y agoOh, interesting. I didn't connect those two. I think my hesitation would not be that 6ft of water is not manageable in the single case, ie, one building. But several thousand of them at the same time? A whole city? Good luck coordinating that in any reasonable amount of time, especially when roads are all flooded. Abandonment is a much more viable option at some point along that particular path.