2 ms·
That doesn't sound right. If you charge money, you have to deliver a product that's fit for service. You can't take people's money then refuse to deliver. At l
by MaxBarraclough 6y ago
That doesn't sound right. If you charge money, you have to deliver a product that's fit for service. You can't take people's money then refuse to deliver.
At least here in the UK, EULAs that say You have no recourse if we completely fail to deliver are generally disregarded in court, as it should be.
- edoceo 6y agoBut this scenario is neither a refusal or complete failure (debatable). But again, the terms of service are more important than the price factor. The big G say they can kick you off whenever/wherever. That it's free in price is just another way to give the "customer" (really just user) less power.