3 ms·
Please help me here to see if I’m getting this. A particle or particles can be described by a wave function. Perturbations in a wave can be described by the ori
by simonh 6y ago
Please help me here to see if I’m getting this. A particle or particles can be described by a wave function. Perturbations in a wave can be described by the original (clean?) wave plus various other waves interfering with it. These other waves, which don’t actually exist independently of the perturbed particle wave, describe the virtual particles. Does that sound right?
I’m wondering what this looks like if you observe these fields from a distance. Are ‘echoes’ of these perturbations and interactions detectable at a distance? In the diagrams in the article representations of these perturbations are shown between the particles, but do these perturbations propagate outside the scope of these interactions? If so, I’d have thought these would count as e.g. photons.
I suppose not necessarily, not all energy levels in a quantum field are achievable, hence discrete discontinuities like absorption lines and electron shells, and in fact particles like electrons themselves. You can’t have a half strength perturbation in the electron field that adds up to half an electron. Do these perturbations fail to propagate outside the local interaction then?
- dexwiz 6y agoI think you may have the model and reality mixed up. The waves in the field actually exist, although not quite like any wave we experience. The virtual particle is just a tool to describe some types of wave field interactions.
- simonh 6y agoThere really are perturbations in the field yes, so I suppose my question is to what extent they have an independent existence outside the wave functions of the particles.