3 ms·
It's not "feudalism", it's human social relations and power dynamics.
by alisonkisk 6y ago
It's not "feudalism", it's human social relations and power dynamics.
- inglor_cz 6y agoDemocratic societies try to limit this problem by establishing some semireliable channels to remedy injustice, though.
- x86_64Ubuntu 6y agoI don't think anyone considers this to be in the realm of injustice.
- inglor_cz 6y agoAnyone? That is a strong word. At least I would consider losing an important asset based on a whim of an algorithm without a possibility of appeal to humans quite a gross injustice, though within the limits of the law as it stands today.
- cema 6y agoI do consider it injustice, in the everyday sense of the word (not legal).
- dleslie 6y agoIt's definitely in the realm of injustice; how could it not be?
- rakoo 6y agoIt's not "power dynamics", it's freedom to innovate
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- croes 6y agoWhat if his post had not been seen or he didn't know HN. Google etc are the gatekeepers they decides what allowed and what isn't.
- mpweiher 6y agoUnregulated power dynamics are basically feudalism. (Well, feudalism put in some regulations...)