5 ms·
>I'd sure like to see a version that doesn't support dual-booting Windows. This seems like exactly what Microsoft would want to inhibit flexibility. I think i
by fuzzfactor 6y ago
>I'd sure like to see a version that doesn't support dual-booting Windows.
This seems like exactly what Microsoft would want to inhibit flexibility.
I think it's still more elegant for GRUB to be a _universal_ boot loader as originally intended.
Also worth waiting for SYSLINUX to allow all this nonsense to be overcome.
- jolmg 6y ago> Also worth waiting for SYSLINUX to allow all this nonsense to be overcome. Is something pending with SYSLINUX?
- fuzzfactor 6y agoOfficial UEFI support.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- TheCycoONE 6y agoFrom the outside syslinux doesn't look very active. Over 2 years since the last commit? https://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/shortlog https://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/shortlog
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- fuzzfactor 6y agoGet on the mailing list and accelerate the process. Try to make it revocation-proof as much as Windows. Until then make the best use of GRUB2 that you can.
- fuzzfactor 6y agoSorry to hurt somebody's feelings, no downvotes from me on HN. I'm not trying to win a popularity contest, but it doesn't look like just anyone would be able to make the kind of worthwhile contribution that would be helpful. To anyone having nothing positive to offer, I can also recommend refraining from joining the mailing list in this case.