3 ms·
> I'm guessing their experiments with scaling up what's in the initial M1-based Macs to more power vs. just maximum efficiency (for instance, a desktop that doe
by _the_inflator 6y ago
> I'm guessing their experiments with scaling up what's in the initial M1-based Macs to more power vs. just maximum efficiency (for instance, a desktop that doesn't need to get 20 hour battery life and can actively cool itself) are turning out so shocking that they know they've got to kill the current product line, immediately.
I totally agree. I believe this is the only reason, why Apple "upgraded" the MacBook pro 13". The new MacBook Air smashed it, so Apple had to do something in the 13" range.
MacBook 16" has the distinctive advantage of a better screen.
I am totally excited about Apple's new MacBook lineup coming later this year. This is going to be really huge.
- kalleboo 6y ago> MacBook 16" has the distinctive advantage of a better screen. Even the MacBook Pro 16" base models have too many ports and too much graphic performance for the original M1 to replace them. The base 13" already had enough limitations that they could replace it without making any of its specs worse (and leave the existing Intel 13" in the range with no changes for the 4-port model)