3 ms·
I've heard this before but never understood the rationale. It's because they have nothing better to argue about? Because winning trivial arguments is all they h
by hatmatrix 6y ago
I've heard this before but never understood the rationale. It's because they have nothing better to argue about? Because winning trivial arguments is all they have?
- teddyh 6y agoThe stakes are low, so they have little to lose.