This reads very non-wikipedia. It is argumentative. Stating positions, and for half of the positions flat out claiming "the evidence does not support this". Ne

This reads very non-wikipedia. It is argumentative. Stating positions, and for half of the positions flat out claiming "the evidence does not support this". Neutral language would be to list raised objections, but instead there are direct claims and arguments. It feels very much like it is written with an academic agenda. I feel wikipedia usually is a lot better at requiring a Neutral presentation.