3 ms·
I think that's what they're saying - that the problem is that there is a single "the guy".
by ericd 6y ago
I think that's what they're saying - that the problem is that there is a single "the guy".
- gostsamo 6y agoThen it should've been "wouldn't have a guy for anything". The issue with funny quips is that if you don't do them correctly ambiguity reigns supreme.
- technion 6y agoI get what they're saying, but in the majority of organisations the persons who spends their entire day reading Adobe's EULA and counting Oracle client installations isn't considered the sort of role that anyone has ever considered needing redundancy or full time availability until this thing broke out.
- Ensorceled 6y agoI’m pretty sure he’s saying that guy is the problem for not being available and should be fired. The way it’s worded, it’s not clear who has the correct interpretation.