5 ms·
Being able to speak without interference from the government. I also think there is a spirit of free speech where the consequences for your speech should not ex
by AshWolfy 6y ago
Being able to speak without interference from the government. I also think there is a spirit of free speech where the consequences for your speech should not exceed the speech itself, though that is obviously less precise and kinda up to individual judgement
- loveistheanswer 6y ago>Being able to speak without interference from the government. Why should freedom of speech apply only to authorities from the public sector?
- AshWolfy 6y agoBecause freedom of association cuts both ways. I also dont like the power that massive corporations have over our lives, but the solution isnt some absurd regulation, its to break them up
- loveistheanswer 6y ago>Because freedom of association cuts both ways. What is freedom of association, isn't that different from freedom of speech? >I also dont like the power that massive corporations have over our lives, but the solution isnt some absurd regulation, its to break them up I think you're probably right about that. Maybe another option could be to create a publicly funded, rather than corporate advertising funded, "town square" social media platform as a viable alternative, where all lawful speech could be voiced and protected?