> I doubt the bill will pass, but if it does, I doubt many manufacturers would comply. They'd probably comply. Most could strike a deal with an existing compa

> I doubt the bill will pass, but if it does, I doubt many manufacturers would comply. They'd probably comply. Most could strike a deal with an existing company to provide software for this. Hell, more than likely a company who makes such software is probably a campaign contributor to many of the supporters of this bill. AFAIK, the law doesn't define how effective the filter must be. So any good-faith attempt is probably more than enough. Even if the software is just a skin of Chrome with a add-on installed that blocks a list of websites. I won't lie though, I would find it hilarious if foxnews.com was put into this obscenity filter.