3 ms·
Okay, so now, relative to floating point arithmetic, you've sacrificed an enormous amount of dynamic range and have to worry about overflow and underflow much m
by civilized 6y ago
Okay, so now, relative to floating point arithmetic, you've sacrificed an enormous amount of dynamic range and have to worry about overflow and underflow much more than before.
What did you gain from this, exactly?
I'm sure there are some special situations where fixed point is better, but for general purpose scientific and technical computing, floating point is obviously the right choice.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- hctaw 6y agoOn some low power architectures without FPUs it is significantly more power/compute efficient to use fixed point arithmetic. But that's really it.