3 ms·

You've changed your argument. Now you're saying "forget half of what I said". I agree that second-order effects need to be considered, certainly. That is the p

You've changed your argument. Now you're saying "forget half of what I said". I agree that second-order effects need to be considered, certainly. That is the point of phase-in periods, which this measure had. Is it long enough, or substantial enough? Should small businesses be able to apply for exemptions, or interest free loans for new equipment, for example? Perhaps. It should be uncontroversial given the facts and experiences with these engines that they are awful pollutants, terribly aggravating to communities, and that the world would be better without them.

Proziam 6y ago
> You've changed your argument. Now you're saying "forget half of what I said" My only point is that the way you implement change matters and that this implementation will adversely affect the worst-off population. > It should be uncontroversial given the facts and experiences with these engines that they are awful pollutants, terribly aggravating to communities, and that the world would be better without them. No controversy there at all.