4 ms·
There’s an HN comment I have saved that describesthe categorization closest to what I’ve experienced. I don’t treat these sort of reductionisms as immutable tru
by the_only_law 6y ago
There’s an HN comment I have saved that describesthe categorization closest to what I’ve experienced. I don’t treat these sort of reductionisms as immutable truths because 1) there’s always enough outliers to make them fall apart and 2) there are a number of different ways you can categorize people. Sure you might have a model where people fit into A and B but someone else has their own equally valid model where people fit into X Y and Z
Anyway here’s a link to the comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12079697 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12079697
- md_ 6y agoI like that! Thanks! In truth, though, I always felt that the large size of "group 1" was an indictment of "group 2". Put differently, I sometimes joke about big companies like LinkedIn or Facebook: "Why does it take thousands of engineers to run a website?" ;)