> So now we need human judges to judge what the intention of a smart contract is? Well, wouldn't it already be quite a win if for 99.9% of the smart contract

> So now we need human judges to judge what the intention of a smart contract is? Well, wouldn't it already be quite a win if for 99.9% of the smart contract out there no human judge was needed? It's an honest question: ain't it unthinkable that most could be fully automated and yet real courts could be used in rare cases and that that'd be already be quite an improvement? Or is the system only working if 100% of the time no human ruling is needed? I have no idea...