>The result is that these massive copyright holders can decide which ideas are allowed, and which ideas will be banned. They're not deciding which ideas are al

>The result is that these massive copyright holders can decide which ideas are allowed, and which ideas will be banned. They're not deciding which ideas are allowed or banned. They're not stopping anyone else from creating, espousing, publishing any other ideas at all. There's thousands of publishers, and even the very biggest only hold a tiny fraction of the publishing market, so this complaint seems quite overblown. Should a publisher be forced to publish things they choose not to? I'd prefer not. There's plenty of others. And the internet makes it easy to post any ideas you choose, vastly easier than at any point in history for individuals to make their ideas available to billions of people.