Who are you delegating the responsibility to for deciding what you should and should not be allowed to read? Are you comfortable with an unpaid 20-something in

Who are you delegating the responsibility to for deciding what you should and should not be allowed to read? Are you comfortable with an unpaid 20-something intern doing the deciding for you? Because, for example, that's who staffs a lot of 'fact checking' sites that Facebook then uses to keep content from you. How about a fundamentalist Christian making those decisions for you? >and some skindheads wanted to buy it, it wasn't available. They went away. They went away eh? I take it Neo-nazism has been solved in Germany? And how, prey tell, did they become skinheads without reading the book? >why not just provide newer childrens books that are more inclusive. Who says these books weren't inclusive? They were read by hundreds of millions of children over the decades and translated into many languages. Show me the harm. It's also distasteful that people who have read and enjoyed these books are now willing to deprive future generations of children from the same enjoyment ... even when it clearly did not hurt them.