3 ms·
> because of its heavy use of JavaScript And why does it have to be 'heavy'? Surely adding a few small embellishments with JS is okay, but the JS needn't be he
by cyberlab 6y ago
> because of its heavy use of JavaScript
And why does it have to be 'heavy'? Surely adding a few small embellishments with JS is okay, but the JS needn't be heavy at all.
- 8bitsrule 6y ago> needn't be heavy at all The words I'd pick are 'careless' or 'sloppy' or 'laughable' use of javascript. The speed of carefully-crafted JS in today's browsers is amazing. If the mule collapses hauling that 20-ton-wagon of borax, there's the culprit.