3 ms·
They do bring value, but that value can greatly depend on how it’s implemented and what your team does. Personally I have found agile to be great the closer you
by danielrhodes 6y ago
They do bring value, but that value can greatly depend on how it’s implemented and what your team does. Personally I have found agile to be great the closer you are to the customer.
Agile at its core is about a few things: committing as a team to work (shared accountability), creating reasonable expectations of what can actually be delivered (as opposed to how much the boss wants to get done), creating a cadence of delivery that is aligned with value to the business, and continuous improvement (through metrics and retros). It’s not perfect, but an agile process run well creates consistency, which over the long run is very important.
Scrum is a way to force communication, create awareness, and adjust prioritization. A lot of people think this is a waste of time, but a high performing team requires excellent communication and this is one way to achieve that. If your team is not getting value out of it, that might mean people are too silo’d.
Having said all this, it’s all about how the team works together. These processes are meant to focus a team on delivering business value. If a team uses another process and performs well, there’s no reason to be dogmatic.
- pracer 6y ago>but a high performing team requires excellent communication and this is one way to achieve that. This is the problem: that sentence is backwards, as it is scrum. A high performance team HAVE excellent communication. So Scrum tries to force this hoping it will create a high performance team. Effect before the cause. Maybe if you are lucky, it would work... maybe.