4 ms·
I guess the inclusion of "per" there was a typo? They used the correct units earlier in the article.
by unishark 6y ago
I guess the inclusion of "per" there was a typo?
They used the correct units earlier in the article.
- mathfailure 6y agoWhich probably means that the journalist doesn't which one is correct. Why even bother writing an article of such quality?
- jsight 6y agoIf the mistake only happened once, its just as likely to be an "improvement" from the editor who actually doesn't know why one is correct.