3 ms·
> You're trying to ascribe malice and dishonesty because you happen to disagree with me. I don't know why the internet does this to people Sigh. I made it clea
by _-___________-_ 6y ago
> You're trying to ascribe malice and dishonesty because you happen to disagree with me. I don't know why the internet does this to people
Sigh. I made it clear in the first comment that I don't disagree with you. I would love to see wider adoption of nuclear power. The sentence that you wrote was inaccurate, and I felt that more accurate wording would improve the quality of the debate. I don't see the point in engaging any further on this.
- jboog 6y agoYou're Right! The sentence devoid of context is misleading!! But the thing is cherry-picking a single sentence without its proper context is misleading if not downright dishonest itself. I was clearly talking about COAL/FF DEATHS IN THE US. Why would I then go on in the very next sentence to compare that to WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEATHS? Then in the NEXT SENTENCE, I bring up Fukushima and Chernobyl and say basically "if you want to count them then...." Nothing about my post was misleading.