You could have been easier to understand if you simply said "nope, you're wrong". But instead, you went on for three paragraphs describing your point of view. Y

You could have been easier to understand if you simply said "nope, you're wrong". But instead, you went on for three paragraphs describing your point of view. You even used a word I had forgotten the definition of: "operators" (Yes, I had to look up the exact definition). Yet I understood everything you said with no ambiguousness. Was this incorrect? Was explaining your point of view inefficient or causing problems in understanding? I think you inadvertently showed how expressive language has enormous benefits, even if people can never understand it 100%.