4 ms·
Nah this is still zero sum. It's limited by the amount of watts we can reasonably extract from the 100 petawatts per day. We use a fraction of the energy hitti
by neonological 6y ago
Nah this is still zero sum. It's limited by the amount of watts we can reasonably extract from the 100 petawatts per day.
We use a fraction of the energy hitting the earth because we can only extract a fraction of it. In this case rate of replenishment functions as a limit. If our rate of usage exceeds the rate in which we can viably extract useful energy from the sun then that means not everyone can have access to this energy. This is a limit. Zero Sum.
If Energy truly was unlimited nobody would be paying for it.
- maxerickson 6y agoIt's not zero sum within the earth system. Trees don't pay for energy.
- neonological 6y agoIt is zero sum within the earth system because the energy is limited. Trees compete for light. The taller trees win, the shorter trees are deprived of sunlight and therefore are the losers.
- chrischattin 6y agoAnd this is a good thing. It’s why simple organisms evolved. It’s why trees even exist in the first place.
- neonological 6y agoAgreed. The Zero Sum game is critical for evolution. Competition for limited resources is the very reason why complex organisms exist. Any economic model of society that doesn't involve the zero sum nature of reality is highly highly inaccurate.