>How does it cost more to rent a hotel room for a homeless person than it does for a home-ful person? Homeless people are probably more likely to cause damage

>How does it cost more to rent a hotel room for a homeless person than it does for a home-ful person? Homeless people are probably more likely to cause damage to the hotels, and hotels are less likely to recoup their costs from the person responsible. There's also been ~20 deaths (mostly overdoses) which I imagine puts extra strain and costs on the hotels. I don't know if they're still doing it, but at least for a while SF had a program where they supplied Project Room Key participants with drugs and alcohol so that they'd be more likely to self-medicate in their hotel rooms and less likely to be out and about. I think that might also end up leading to more property damage + smoking fees