Agreed - letting the request fire at all is the critical point, and I believe that's the true motivation behind using CNAMEs (they evade blacklists). CNAMEs an

Agreed - letting the request fire at all is the critical point, and I believe that's the true motivation behind using CNAMEs (they evade blacklists). CNAMEs and first-party cookie access aren't helping networks link identities across sites in Firefox and Safari - at this point they're stuck relying on browser fingerprinting. And as you point out, fingerprinting can be quite effective, especially for people on static IPs :| This paper is claiming that CNAMEs are evading the protections offered by Safari and Firefox but that's just not the case. Or at least, the paper hasn't explained how.