> Agile was written at a resort by 10x engineers for 10x engineers. Do these 10x engineers need Scrum ? Not to beat a dead horse one more time, but "Agile <> S

> Agile was written at a resort by 10x engineers for 10x engineers. Do these 10x engineers need Scrum ? Not to beat a dead horse one more time, but "Agile <> Scrum" Scrum is just one, out of many methodologies that claim some association with the core ideas behind the Agile Manifesto. It's totally possible to be "Agile" and not do a single thing that's in Scrum. And just to add one more note: there's a lot of "stuff" that gets lumped in with Scrum in a lot of these criticism heavy threads, that isn't actually part of Scrum per-se. Often times idiot would-be Scrum masters cobble together bits and piece of ideas here and there and make some goofy hodge-podge and then call it Scrum. I'd encourage anybody contemplating Scrum for whatever reason to go read the Scrum Guide and see how different it is from the "Scrum" their organization practices. Same for the Agile Manifesto. And if you encounter an organization that claims to be doing SAFE (Scaled Agile Framework) turn and run away as fast as you can, IMO.