3 ms·
>they would introduce randomness Not good enough for free will, which needs true unknownability, like in, we don't know whether Schrödinger's cat is dead or al
by pieter_mj 6y ago
>they would introduce randomness
Not good enough for free will, which needs true unknownability, like in, we don't know whether Schrödinger's cat is dead or alive, until we look.
- omginternets 6y agoYou already get that unknowability at the intramolecular level, i.e. pharmacological agents binding to receptors. Your theory adds zero explanatory power.