3 ms·

I know you said you're not going to reply, but I find it rather interesting indeed that your response to an article about gender (role) conditioning is an artic

I know you said you're not going to reply, but I find it rather interesting indeed that your response to an article about gender (role) conditioning is an article about gender identity, as though "wears blue" or "plays games" are hardcoded global constants in the human masculine identity.

neonological 6y ago
Ok one more response. A Gender Identity by definition is more than just a verbal issue where the person cares only about getting identified as the word "He" or "She." When you identify with a gender you identify with certain "roles" and "conditioning" associated with a gender. See definition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_identity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_identity The two phrases "role" and "identity" are similar enough that within this context I can use the terms interchangeably. Also please don't go like "I find it ironic that you..." or "I find it interesting that you..." or "I find it fascinating that you still believe..." or any of that kind of language like that. It's condescending and insulting and not to mention manipulative. If you truly are open minded you'd talk to someone who shares a different opinion than you as an equal rather than refer to them as if you were observing some "fascinating" animal with "interesting" behavior that lives in a zoo. That's it no more replies. Thread ends here. 100% I swear. Don't ban me, Dang.