Which should help you understand my perspective better. I don’t agree that Borland “had very little except "me too" products“ just because another product in th

Which should help you understand my perspective better. I don’t agree that Borland “had very little except "me too" products“ just because another product in the same category existed first. Lotus 1-2-3 was essentially a clone of VisiCalc on the IBM PC but it was also its own thing.