2 ms·
> it is simply weasel words. That is not very nice to say. !g astrazeneca 60% effective site:.eu : First hit : https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommen
by the-dude 6y ago
> it is simply weasel words.
That is not very nice to say.
!g astrazeneca 60% effective site:.eu :
First hit : https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-authorisation-eu https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-covid-19-va...
Please note I blame them for the general narrative around AZ as being not trustworthy. It is very clear to see in comments from the Dutch public ( and I have seen similar sentiments at our DE neighbors ).
It does not help our press is not very critical, I'll give you that.
- jamesrr39 6y agoSorry, I didn't mean to be offensive with the "weasel words" comment, simply that is the term for this kind of "much quoted figure" kind of text (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word). Thanks for providing a link to the EMA press release though. On the note of that press release, the title of the page is "EMA recommends COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca for authorisation in the EU", which I wouldn't consider anti-AZ, and reading the text it states in the same paragraph that it's talking about "reduction in the number of symptomatic COVID-19 cases in people given the vaccine". Anyway, I didn't mean to offend, just calling out what I saw, others may have a different opinion to me of course.