4 ms·
dBase IV tanked the dBase Line. dBase III+ was an amazing product - that everyone used, was super reliable - I made a ton[1] of money in college writing up, te
by ghshephard 6y ago
dBase IV tanked the dBase Line. dBase III+ was an amazing product - that everyone used, was super reliable - I made a ton[1] of money in college writing up, teaching dBase III+ systems (Along with with FoxBase PRO).
When dBase IV came out (From Ashton Tate, Not Borland) it was buggy, and much of the stuff in the user manual literally did not work. I was super excited about the SQL support in dBase IV - until after an entire evening of trying to get it to work I realized they had shipped non-functional code. Not buggy - it just didn't actually work as documented. Ended the company. (They came up with massive patches years later - but it was too late - people had moved on).
I would love to read a story on how they decided to ship a product that was essentially still 12-18 months from being completed. I'm guessing (?) they were about to run out of cash - and selling something, even if it didn't work, kept the lights on? Hard to believe given how dominant dBase III+ was back then.
[1] Where, by ton, I mean many, many hundreds of dollars. Which felt like a lot of money back then.
- tibbydudeza 6y agoDbase IV biggest issue was that it supported the SQL syntax for the first time and it's implementation was just buggy and FoxPro just worked better.
- toddh 6y agoLoved FoxBase PRO. In college I traded a gym membership for foxbase programming. I sometimes wonder that we haven't progressed much at all from those days.
- protomyth 6y agoFirst real job and all I had was Foxbase Pro, Turbo C 2.01, and a PostScript printer. It made for some interesting programing and data display.
- tragomaskhalos 6y ago"In Search of Stupidity: Over Twenty Years of High Tech Marketing Disasters" is a great book that covers Ashton Tate's blunders, as well as others from the golden age of tech.
- l33tman 6y agoThis book is mandatory reading.
- Jemm 6y agodBase III+ was pretty good but I wouldn't call it super reliable. It had a bad habit of corrupting the database often requiring a rebuild. Not a big deal but a bit of a productivity killer.