3 ms·
Softbank made an interesting playbook. They made a bet that given their fund size (magnitude order larger then VC funding at the time) they could find large sc
by boringg 6y ago
Softbank made an interesting playbook. They made a bet that given their fund size (magnitude order larger then VC funding at the time) they could find large scale opportunities fund those companies and outlast longer and out muscle the competition based largely on size of capital alone. I.e. hold on to losses before the competitors ran out of gas and then take market share. As a result competition has had to up the amount of funding sizes so that they can compete with Softbank investments or risk not being able to keep marketshare.
Also creates some really perverse incentives in that you can sustain an unsustainable business model much longer driving out other businesses/competition at the same time then VC traditional could. It is a pretty big bet and has lots of capital in the mix - founder of Softbank has a history of high risk bets (not always going well either I would add).
- marc__1 6y ago> can sustain an unsustainable business model much longer What is the data you have to back that any of these business are unsustainable: Uber, Guardant Health, Doordash, 10X Genomics, Slack, Opendoor, Seer, Beike? I don't and the broader market neither. If you do, shorting is a great strategy to give you an outsize payoff
- boringg 6y agoUnsustainable was the wrong word. Correction -->. "can sustain a higher cash burn for longer before getting to revenue positive"
- nmfisher 6y agoLast I checked, Uber, DoorDash and Slack weren’t profitable (and I don’t know about the others). Doesn’t that mean there’s some truth to that comment?