5 ms·
This is a reaction to opposing voices that wants to quell those quickly anytime they arise. There hasn’t been, and there won’t be, any action taken against supp
by wtmt 6y ago
This is a reaction to opposing voices that wants to quell those quickly anytime they arise. There hasn’t been, and there won’t be, any action taken against supporters of the government or even government authorities even when they incite murder in prepared and recorded public speeches (search online for “shoot the traitors” remark).
This is also one more of those “all encryption should have backdoors so that the government alone can snoop” (as if the government is always trustworthy, responsible, and is one single, uniform and dedicated being). This playbook has been seen in other countries too, even the developed ones.
The government and authorities don’t even provide any information about random website blocking orders or any way to get incorrectly implemented orders resolved quickly.
It’s one sided to aid those in power and take power from those who are already on the other side of the scale. We don’t need more of this.
- thunkshift1 6y ago...Which is hypocritical when us based tech companies extend the same privileges to us govt, no questions asked. If you are a growing company vying to capture one of the biggest internet markets in the world, do you think the govt in that market is just going to sit by and let things happen without some of the afore mentioned privileges coming their way? Thats not going to happen. At all. I think over the next few years every govt is going to have some laws along same the lines.