7 ms·
If he did it on purpose, he's a supervillain, if he did it due to negligence, he's a hypocrite. No need to split hairs.
by gitrog 6y ago
If he did it on purpose, he's a supervillain, if he did it due to negligence, he's a hypocrite. No need to split hairs.
- read_if_gay_ 6y agoThe way I understood GP they were explicitly insinuating he was a supervillain, so I don't think it's hairsplitting.
- ricardobayes 6y agoI'm not saying Elon's a supervillain, more of a wasted talent (so far). The non-solutions he presents to non-problems are weird to say the least. Hand on heart, do we really need space tourism and luxury cars affordable by wealthy middle-aged men? How does this contribute to a better society? Returning to the point at hand, both EV's and blockchain are non-solutions to difficult (and valid) problems. In my view, centralized money and climate change can only be only effectively solved at the origin and not the consumer level. The solutions offered are annoyingly superficial, like taking away our drinking straws and fake internet money that has no use other than to make more centralized money.