4 ms·
> were obliged to glorify the Soviet ideology. Obliged by a authoritarian state (that could be violent, or destroy your career) is incomparable to some peer (t
by cies 6y ago
> were obliged to glorify the Soviet ideology.
Obliged by a authoritarian state (that could be violent, or destroy your career) is incomparable to some peer (that seems not very interested in begin violent nor career destroying) believing others should be obliged. Incomparable. Not sure what logical fallacy this is, but "incomparable" should do the trick.
Why would you want to compare the two, I ask myself?
- Grustaf 6y ago> or destroy your career It’s not quite mandatory to praise feminism yet, for private individuals, but what do you think would happen to the academic career of someone who openly opposed feminism!
- cies 6y agoWhy you want to compare "potential punishment for lack of endorsement of the state" in the USSR with "potential punishment for opposing feminism" in modern days? Those are such different things... Where I'm from there are plenty of people who oppose parts of feminism. And I dont see them being punished at all. Even I'm openly opposing some of what nowadays is part of feminism!