5 ms·

Sorry for letting you down, everyone. Three is our limit!

• tibbydudeza 6y ago
  Most middle class homes in our suburbs only have 3 bedrooms so that sort of caps kids to 2 or less. While we have a public schooling system if you want you kid into the "better" schools you need to pay extra for additional teachers to reduce the classroom ratio and facilities.
  • frockington1 6y ago
    When you factor in taxes, the math can change. Sometimes 12 years of private school is cheaper than municipal income and property taxes
  • harambae 6y ago
    >Most middle class homes in our suburbs only have 3 bedrooms so that sort of caps kids to 2 or less. I grew up in a family of 5 with 3 bedrooms. My brother and I shared a room (as did my parents). Bunk bed setup. I wouldn't consider myself poor growing up, it's a normal thing here. In places like Hong Kong I think it gets quite a bit more extreme than this.
  • dragonwriter 6y ago
    > Most middle class homes in our suburbs only have 3 bedrooms so that sort of caps kids to 2 or less. No, it doesn't. Heck, my wife’s parents had an urban studio apartment and two kids when she was growing up, so I don't think three more bedrooms than that provides a hard cap of two kids. In fact, I lived in a suburban middle class home with three bedrooms and three kids, so I know it doesn't.
  • souprock 6y ago
    Most rooms can hold 3 bunk beds. If the bunk beds are only 2-level and you put two kids in the lower part, that comes to 9 kids per room. Babies can stay with you. That's a 10x density increase. You can have 20 kids now. Since the kids leave home at about age 20, you can have 1 kid per year without ever stopping.
• mehphp 6y ago
  Three!? I got the.. ahem... boys taken care of immediately after the second. haha