3 ms·
You'd prefer something like vec.construct_then_push_back(foo, bar)? I think it's reasonable that people would want a pithier name than that, for something you'r
by dmurray 6y ago
You'd prefer something like vec.construct_then_push_back(foo, bar)? I think it's reasonable that people would want a pithier name than that, for something you're going to use constantly.
- user-the-name 6y ago"f8" would be even shorter, but we don't use that, because it is more important that code is easy to read than quick to write.
- bregma 6y agoI think they mean `std::vector::construct_back_in_place()`. 200 character line widths will no longer be enough: 400 or 500 will be more realistic. Sacrifice readability for readability.
- user-the-name 6y agoHow many function calls do you put on a single line? Break those statements up!