It is not currently censored. It has been moved to a new location. If you want to view the video, it's at https://business.lehigh.edu/news/understanding-povert

It is not currently censored. It has been moved to a new location. If you want to view the video, it's at https://business.lehigh.edu/news/understanding-poverty?fbclid=IwAR2-2LbEWfwfEWJij7j3Uhvt1WYHgU2IcCbXBb4vDy0WqaKkqXvvGgTxg3A https://business.lehigh.edu/news/understanding-poverty?fbcli... along with a rebuttal, and links to various supporting documents and commentary. My reading of the various criticisms show they mostly focus on the invalid arguments in the original video, and its framing. http://www.electrostani.com/2021/02/a-response-to-frank-gunters-myths-about.html http://www.electrostani.com/2021/02/a-response-to-frank-gunt... summarizes it nicely as: > I believe Professor Gunter’s YouTube video uses data misleadingly, though the real source of the visceral reaction many students have had to his arguments probably comes from his language and rhetoric. > If his first slide had said “U.S. Census Data Suggests Poverty Rates are Declining for Black Americans,” instead of “Poverty is Not a Matter of Race,” frankly, I doubt we would even be talking about this. So the first takeaway is: how you frame arguments and the language you use matters.