3 ms·
The complainers didn't care whether he was right or wrong, just whether it was rightthink or wrongthink.
by db48x 6y ago
The complainers didn't care whether he was right or wrong, just whether it was rightthink or wrongthink.
- eesmith 6y agoI watched the response video at https://business.lehigh.edu/news/understanding-poverty?fbclid=IwAR2-2LbEWfwfEWJij7j3Uhvt1WYHgU2IcCbXBb4vDy0WqaKkqXvvGgTxg3A https://business.lehigh.edu/news/understanding-poverty?fbcli... . It was all about cases where he was wrong, with citations and links.
- db48x 6y agoCriticism is one thing, but once you start calling someone a racist then you're no longer interested in changing their mind. It's not a reasoned argument, it's an emotional one. The only thing it can be used for is firing up a mob or destroying a career.
- eesmith 6y agoSo, what's your reasoned argument, and what was your goal in making such an incorrect blanket statement? The article says only that 'some students' called him racist. How do you infer that that means the large majority of those who criticize him are doing so for groupthink reasons?