Agreed... I don't see why people are arguing this problematic sscanf behaviour should be seen as an intentional deficiency and not a bug. The argument seems to

Agreed... I don't see why people are arguing this problematic sscanf behaviour should be seen as an intentional deficiency and not a bug. The argument seems to be, "what were you expecting using C stdlib functions for that?" Well, of course they will suck forever with that mentality.