> Rh will argue best financiary duty was to protect his customers from the volatility Wouldn't that line of argument determine that traders would have the fidu

> Rh will argue best financiary duty was to protect his customers from the volatility Wouldn't that line of argument determine that traders would have the fiduciary duty to only allow their clients to sell on price hikes and buy on price drops? Because otherwise that line of reasoning is highly arbitrary in the sense of what RobinHood claims is in the best interests of his customer, and thus very unlike anything regarding fiduciary responsibility.