at least in the first one didn't it require active sabotage of multiple systems (power security IT...) by a trusted insider with little to no supervision simult

at least in the first one didn't it require active sabotage of multiple systems (power security IT...) by a trusted insider with little to no supervision simultaneous with a freak storm for that to happen though? and as i recall there were few if any redundant systems you would expect along, the whole thing being run by a skeleton staff. also at least based on the movies depiction its obvious no one involved ever studied zoo construction or best practices. a power outage should never cause a zoo exhibit to fail open. a tree should not be were it will could fall and let a animal out. also every pin for anything that you wouldn't allow in a petting zoo should have not just had a electric fence (which should have each had a backup generator) but also a ditch, moat, and shear face far enough back to prevent escape by any animal making a running jump. the whole park was pretty much as a death trap just based on the way it was built. Hammond should have been convicted of criminal negligence.