3 ms·
> Theft is taking something without paying for it. According to this definition, dumpster diving would be theft. The harms caused by theft and copyright infrin
by c1ccccc1 6y ago
> Theft is taking something without paying for it.
According to this definition, dumpster diving would be theft. The harms caused by theft and copyright infringement are different. Calling them both theft is just a marketing ploy. Stealing something deprives the owner of its use. Copyright is a monopoly granted by the government to an artist on a piece of intellectual property. This is socially beneficial because it means more people can make a living by creating art. Copyright infringement means evading this monopoly, and is harmful for the same reason that granting the monopoly is beneficial.
For example, dumpster diving is neither theft nor copyright infringement. It's not theft because taking food that has been thrown away isn't depriving anyone of its use. It's not copyright infringement, because we as a society do not deem it socially beneficial to grant anybody a monopoly on food production. This is true even though the dumpster diver is taking food without paying the farmers who produced it.
- anoncake 6y ago> According to this definition, dumpster diving would be theft. In many jurisdictions, it legally is. Morally, I agree that's bullshit.