4 ms·
It's not a trustless solution, but one that requires multiple parties to collude to break trust as opposed to in most search engines cases, just one. In other
by rasengan 6y ago
It's not a trustless solution, but one that requires multiple parties to collude to break trust as opposed to in most search engines cases, just one.
In other words, if "Search Engine Company" wants to deanonymize and link your search with your query, they can.
If Private.sh or Gigablast want to, the two separate entities will have to collude. This isn't zero-trust, but it's absolutely 'lesser trust' than the current offerings outside of Private.sh.
- jedberg 6y ago> This isn't zero-trust, but it's absolutely 'lesser trust' than the current offerings outside of Private.sh. In what way? How do I know the two owners of the companies aren't the same person? Heck, how do I know that Private.sh isn't just a Google spinoff? There's absolutely nothing that guarantees that Private.sh and Gigablast aren't the same person or the same company. I'd say it's the same level of trust as DDG or Google.