3 ms·
That doesn't explain complex numbers with real numbers (matrices are not real numbers). So the point of the article, and my comment still stands.
by ko27 6y ago
That doesn't explain complex numbers with real numbers (matrices are not real numbers). So the point of the article, and my comment still stands.
- GoblinSlayer 6y agoYou can say that about anything, like real quantum mechanics isn't just real numbers, but also functions, equations, operators and a lot of stuff like that.
- ko27 6y ago> Functions, equations, operators All of those are part of Peano and ZFC axiomatic systems, which were thought to be enough to explain all of physics (albeit not easily). Matrices and imaginary numbers are not part of those formal systems. Just ask yourself. If you are right, why didn't Schrodinger or the researches that are publishing this study just think of your idea of using matrices?