3 ms·
The thing (which is subtle) is that the dimensionality is 1. Which is, as far as I have read the intro to the preprint cited in the Quanta article, what the aut
by pfortuny 6y ago
The thing (which is subtle) is that the dimensionality is 1. Which is, as far as I have read the intro to the preprint cited in the Quanta article, what the authors are mistaken.
Algebraically, as vector spaces:
C is the change of base of R when tensored by C
which is not the same as
R^2 as R-vector space tensored by C
(not at all the same).