The EV vs Hydrogen debate is fundamentally flawed. It's pitting two technologies as the upstart against each other instead of against the internal combustion e

The EV vs Hydrogen debate is fundamentally flawed. It's pitting two technologies as the upstart against each other instead of against the internal combustion engines/traditional oil and gas infrastructure. Its the same thing as saying wind vs solar for electricity when both are needed. Let's move on from this false narrative. More details: It's flawed because EV and H2 work in so many different markets/use cases and that it isn't a zero sum world where it is an either or. We need both H2 and EVs to knock off traditional ICE and traditional fuel stocks for a cleaner future for future generations. Remember that they will be knocked off the pedestal in the future by something even better hopefully. As others have mentioned - the debate isn't around which is the most efficient technology though that does help. There are so many different variables involved - too many to put in a HN comment thread.