5 ms·
Absolutely agree. What's your preferred terminology? I like "Forward" and "Reverse" for positive and negative number and "Lateral" for the imaginary unit, sinc
by janderson3 6y ago
Absolutely agree.
What's your preferred terminology? I like "Forward" and "Reverse" for positive and negative number and "Lateral" for the imaginary unit, since it is just perpendicular to the Forward and Reverse numbers.
- klmadfejno 6y agoGood and evil.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- _jal 6y agoSpooky and strange?
- andrewprock 6y agoHuman and Werewolf.
- kortex 6y agoSpooky Werewolf Algebras on the Monster group. Coming to arxiv this October.
- Robotbeat 6y agoI just think of them as different axes on a 2D Cartesian plane. That’s basically how they work. EDIT: similarly, quaternions as a number in 4D, with that extra dimension being handy for avoiding the instability problems when you get near “gimbal lock” in 3D rotations.
- phkahler 6y agoBut the quaternions sort of make the real component special dont they?
- kortex 6y agoThat it more an effect of how we use them in computer geometry. Unit quaternions with ijk plus real map to an xyz tilt plus a rotor. But I believe you could pick any such mapping. On the other hand, dual quaternions do care which is the dual component, since multiplying by complex numbers looks like true rotation, while multiplying by a dual looks like rotation around a point at infinity, aka translation. So in that case maybe there is something special about the real component.
- injb 6y agoThat's pretty close to what Gauss said they should be called: "If ... +1, -1, and √-1 had been called direct, inverse and lateral units, instead of positive, negative, and imaginary (or impossible) units, such an obscurity would have been out of the question" (https://shitohichiumaya.blogspot.com/2016/10/gausss-quote-for-positive-negative-and.html https://shitohichiumaya.blogspot.com/2016/10/gausss-quote-fo...)
- yccs27 6y agoI also like the name "lateral unit", maybe call the field "planar numbers"?