So every publisher that's ever reject any piece of work is a censor? It's not censorship to decide to no longer publish something. It's only censorship if some

So every publisher that's ever reject any piece of work is a censor? It's not censorship to decide to no longer publish something. It's only censorship if someone comes along and stops you from publishing it. The owners of the work have decided to stop publishing it. They have that right. No one can force them to publish a damn thing. Forcing someone to say or publish something they do not believe in anymore (or perhaps never believed in) is dystopian and tyrannical.