4 ms·
So I am a very bad developer, but I can answer 1a. Weigh 3x3-> if they are the same, then just compare the 2 that are left. If not, discard the 3 in the lighte
by petervandijck 15y ago
So I am a very bad developer, but I can answer 1a.
Weigh 3x3-> if they are the same, then just compare the 2 that are left. If not, discard the 3 in the lightest heap, and weight 1x1. Done.
1b is harder. I would guess you can put 8 on the side (and do the first solution if the others are the same), so 24 in total. Correct?
I guess these tests test for logical thinking, but not for development skills.
2a. Cut it up, put it through the blender, put the fridge on its back side and pour it in. If it doesn't fit, let it dry in the sun (remove water), try to pour again. 2b. Same.
2c. tarzan
2d. over a bridge?
- allwein 15y agoQuestion 2, being on the more humorous side, isn't completely logically consistent. 2a)You open the door and put the elephant in the fridge, and close the door. It appears that you made some assumption about either the smallness of the fridge or the largeness of the elephant. Also theoretically tests if you went for a simple solution or try to overcomplicate things. 2b)You open the door, take out the elephant, put in the giraffe, and shut the door. In theory, this tests you ability to track the state of a problem and your previous actions. The part that pisses me off, is you usually lose points for not taking the elephant out first. If I have a theoretical fridge that's big enough to hold an elephant, why can't it be big enough to hold a giraffe at the same time? 2c) This one is easy after you've been given the answer to number 2b. Obviously the giraffe is missing, since he's still locked in the fridge. 2d)Just swim across, all the alligators are at the jungle meeting from 2c.